المسؤولية الدولية عن التقصير في حماية الأشخاص من الفقدان وعدم تحديد مصيرهم

المؤلفون

  • م.د علي محمد كاظم الموسوي جامعة البيان / كلية القانون المؤلف

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64184/ajlps.V2.I3.Y2025.P1174-1209.430

الكلمات المفتاحية:

الأشخاص المفقودين، الاختفاء القسري، أسر المفقودين، المسؤولية الدولية، واجب المنع، كفالة إحترام القانون الدولي الإنساني.

الملخص

يعد فقدان الأشخاص في العمليات العدائية وظروف إنعدام الأمن الأخرى من أقسى الآثار السلبية لهذه العمليات والظروف. والقانون الدولي الإنساني وبجانبه القانون الدولي الجنائي يعملان على توفير الحماية اللازمة للأشخاص من الفقدان فضلاً عن توفير الحماية الأساسية للشخص المفقود وأسرته. ولكن أهمية هذه المسألة تستلزم بالتأكيد توفير الاطار الذي يجعل الدول مسؤولة عن تلك التصرفات التي تقوم بها أو تنسب إليها. ولا تقف حدود المسؤولية على هذا فقط، بل ينبغي أن تتحمل الدولة المسؤولية عن تقصيرها في إتخاذ واجب منع الانتهاكات بشأن الاشخاص المفقودين، وتتحمل الدولة والمجتمع الدولي بأسره المسؤولية في حالة التقصير في كفالة إحترام القانون الدولي الإنساني.

المراجع

Sources and References

First/ Legislation:

- International Agreements:

1. Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court of 1998

2. The Four Geneva Conventions of 1949 and their Additional Protocols

3. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide of 1949

4. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance of 2006

5. Draft International Responsibility for Internationally Wrongful Acts and its Commentaries of 2001

Second/ Books:

1. Jean-Marie Henckerts and Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Volume 1: Rules), International Committee of the Red Cross, Cairo, 2007.

2. Adel Ahmed Al-Tai, Public International Law, 3rd ed., Dar Al-Thaqafa for Publishing and Distribution, Amman, 2014

3. Essam Al-Attiyah, Public International Law, 2nd ed., Al-Maktaba Al-Qanouniya, Baghdad, 2012

4. Nizar Al-Anbaki, International Humanitarian Law, 1st ed., Dar Wael For publication, Amman, 2010

Third / Research:

1. Ali Mohammed Kadhim Al-Mousawi, The Obligation of Third Parties to Ensure Respect for International Humanitarian Law, Journal of the College of Law, Al-Nahrain University, 2018, Volume 20, Issue 2

Fourth / International Reports:

1. United Nations General Assembly, Missing Persons, Sixty-ninth Session, 18 December 2014, (A/RES/69/184)

2. United Nations General Assembly, Missing Persons, Sixty-ninth Session, 18 December 2014, (A/RES/69/184)

3. United Nations General Assembly, Missing Persons, Seventy-first Session, 5 August 2016, (A/71/299)

4. United Nations General Assembly, Missing Persons, Seventy-first Session, 5 August 2016, (A/71/299)

5. United Nations General Assembly, Missing Persons Missing Persons, Seventy-first session, 5 August 2016, (A/71/299)

6. United Nations General Assembly, Report of the Human Rights Council Advisory Committee on Best Practices on the Question of Persons, Sixteenth session, 21 February 2011, (A/HRC/16/70)

7. Interpretive Guide to the Concept of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law, International Committee of the Red Cross, First Arabic Edition, Cairo, 2010

8. International Committee of the Red Cross, Guidelines/Model Law on Missing Persons, 2009

Fifth/ Court Judgments and Advisory Opinions:

- Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, 2004

sixth/ References in English:

1. Karine Bannelier-Christakis, Cyber Diligence: A Low-Intensity Due Diligence Principle for Low-Intensity Cyber Operations?, Baltic Yearbook of International Law, 2014, Vol.14

2. Knut Dormann & Jose Serralvo, Common Article 1 to the Geneva Conventions and the Obligation to Prevent International Humanitarian Law Violations, International Review of the Red Cross, 2014, No.895/896

3. Kubo Macak, Decoding Article 8 of the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Oxford University Press, 2016, Vol.21, No.3

4. Lindsey Cameron & Bruno Demeyere & Jean-Marie Henkaerts & Eve La Haye & Heike Niebrgall-Lackner, The Updated Commentary on the First Geneva Convention– a new tool for generating respect for international humanitarian law, International Review of the Red Cross, 2015, No.900

5. Nicolo Bussolati, The Rise of Non-State Actors in Cyberwarfare, Published in: Cyberwar: Law and Ethics for Virtual Conflicts, Edited by Jens David Ohlin & Kevin Govern & Claire Finkelstein, Oxford University Press, 2015

6. Qerkin Berisha & Bleta Brovina, The Missing Persons in Kosovo, The Human Rights Center of the University of Prishtina, 2006

7. Russell Buchan, Cyberspace, Non-State Actors and the Obligation to Prevent Transboundary Harm, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Oxford University Press, 2016, Vol.21, No.3

8. Stefanie Grant, Dead and Missing Migrants: The Obligation of European States under International Human Rights Law, International Organization for Migration, September 2016

9. Tim Maurer, ‘Proxies’ and Cyberspace, Journal of Conflict & Security Law, Oxford University Press, 2016, Vol.21, No.3

A- Court decisions:

1. ICJ, UK v.Albania, The Corfu Channel Case (Merits), Judgment of April 9th, 1949

2. ICC, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Trial Chamber I, Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Rome Statute, Case No.(ICC-01/04-01/06), Judgment of 14 March 2012

3. ICJ, Argentina v. Uruguay, Pulp Mills Case, Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay, Judgment of 20 April 2010

4. ICJ, Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro, Bosnia Genocide Case, Case Concerning Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocied, Judgment of 26 February 2007

5. ICJ, Nicaragua v. U.S.A, Judgment, Military and Paramilitary Activities in and Againnst Nicaragua, Judgment of 6 November 2003

6. ICJ, United States of America v. Iran, Tehran Hostages Case, Case Concerning United States Diplomatic and Consular in Tehran, Judgment of 24 May 1980

7. ICTY, Prosecuter v. Kupreškić et al., judgment of 14 Junuary 2000, Case No.(IT-95-16)

8. ICTY, Prosecutor v. Tadic, Appeal Chamber, Case No.(IT-95-14-T), Judgment of 3 March 2000

9. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), Seabed Disputes Chamber, Responsibilities and Obligations of States Sponsoring Persons and Entities with Respect to activities in the Area (Advisory Opinion), 2011

B- Conventions:

- European Convention on Cybercrime, Budapest 2001

C-Studies & Commentary:

1. Center for Global Legal Challenges, State Responsibility for Non-State Actors that Detain in the Course of a NIAC, Yale Law School, December 7, 2015

2. Commentary of 2016 on Convention (I) for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, Article (1): Respect for the Convention

3. ICRC, The Missing and their Families, Summary of the Conclusions arising from Events held prior to the International Conference of Governmental and Non-Governmental Experts (19-21 February 2003)

4. Commentary on the Forth Geneva Convention of 12 August 1949, Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in time of War, Published by ICRC in 1958, under general editorship of Jean S. Pictet .

التنزيلات

منشور

2025-09-01

كيفية الاقتباس

المسؤولية الدولية عن التقصير في حماية الأشخاص من الفقدان وعدم تحديد مصيرهم. (2025). مجلة اشور للعلوم القانونية و السياسية تصدر عن الجمعية العراقية للعلوم القانونية, 2(3), 1174-1209. https://doi.org/10.64184/ajlps.V2.I3.Y2025.P1174-1209.430

المؤلفات المشابهة

1-10 من 176

يمكنك أيضاً إبدأ بحثاً متقدماً عن المشابهات لهذا المؤلَّف.