The electronic transformation of the judiciary in Iraq and its impact on international standards of litigation rights
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64184/ajlps.V3.I1.Y2026.P849-866.313Keywords:
modern technology, digital transformation, Iraqi judiciaryAbstract
efficient justice can no longer be achieved without integrating information and communication technologies into case management and judicial procedures. Technology does not merely enhance administrative efficiency; it also directly affects procedural guarantees by facilitating access to justice, expediting dispute resolution, and reducing litigation costs. The 2005 Iraqi Constitution guarantees the right to litigation and a fair trial, which requires that digital transformation strengthen rather than undermine these safeguards. At the international level, e-justice is closely linked to human rights standards, particularly those established in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which mandates a fair and public hearing before a competent, independent, and impartial tribunal within a reasonable time. Nevertheless, this transformation raises significant legal and judicial challenges, including data protection, the evidentiary value of electronic documents, the rights of defense, and the publicity of proceedings, necessitating legislative reforms that balance technological efficiency with constitutional guarantees .
References
References
1. Ibrahim Qadim. (2020). Restrictive conditions in technology transfer contracts and their role in perpetuating technological dependency at the international level. Egypt: Ain Shams University.
2. Ahmed Sabah Abdul Karim. (2023). Crimes arising from technological development and their impact on criminal policy. Karbala: University of Karbala.
3. Adam Wahib Al-Nadawi. (n.d.). Explanation of the Law of Evidence. Baghdad: Legal Library.
4. Aydorg Al-Akhdar. (1999). Media Intelligence in the Information Age. Riyadh: King Fahd National Library.
5. Hussein Abdulhadi Al-Bayaa. (1986). Explanation of Evidence Law No. 107 of 1979, Vol. 1. Baghdad: D. N.
6. Dr. Abbas Al-Aboudi. (Issue 8, 3, 2000). The Scope of Civil Judges' Authority in the Evolving Interpretation of Law, Vol. 1. Al-Rafidain Law Journal.
7. Samira Mahmoud. (1997). Computers and Newspaper Industry Technology, Vol. 1. Cairo: Afjar Publishing and Distribution.
8. Saleh bin Bakr Al-Tayyar. (n.d.). International Contracts for Technology Transfer, 2nd ed. Beirut: Dar Bilal Publishing.
9. Fahmi Jamil Shannoun. (Issue 35, Vol. 18, 2019). E-litigation. Misan University Journal of Historical and Academic Studies.
10. Mohammed Ali Al-Souri. (1983). Comparative Commentary on the Materials of the Law of Evidence, Vol. 1. Baghdad: Shafiq Printing Press.
11. Mohammed Fawzi. (Issue 1, 2022). Digital Justice and Virtual Courts. Benha Journal of Humanities, Faculty of Law.
12. Mohammed Latif Karim Al-Obeidi. (Issue 3, Volume 1, 2017). Electronic Litigation - A Comparative Study. Tikrit University Law Journal.
13. Mahmoud Ibrahim Khalil and Sharif Darwish Al-Laban. (2000). Recent Trends in Journalistic Production, Vol. 1. Cairo: Al-Arabi Publishing and Distribution.
14. Richard Susskind. (2019). Online Courts and the Future of Justice. Oxford University Press.
15. Cappelletti, M., & Garth, B. (1978). Access to Justice. Oxford University Press
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ashur Journal of Legal and Political Sciences is issued by the Iraqi Association of Legal Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain Full copyright of their published article
Ashur Journal of Legal and Political Sciences applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by AJLPS, you agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to your work.
Articles can be read and shared for under the following conditions:
BY: Attribution must be given to the original source (Attribution)
Full details available at
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/




