Unmanned Aerial Vehicles and International Humanitarian Law: A Study of Legal and Ethical Challenges in the Cases of Gaza and Lebanon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64184/ajlps.V2.I3.Y2025.P470-493.138الكلمات المفتاحية:
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), International Humanitarian Law (IHL), Targeted Killing, Principle of Proportionality, Legal Accountability.الملخص
This study investigates the complex legal and ethical challenges posed by the use of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) in contemporary armed conflicts, with a specific focus on the application of International Humanitarian Law (IHL). The research first outlines the definitional and historical framework of UAVs and their various classifications. It then analyzes the compatibility of their deployment with the core principles of IHL: distinction, proportionality, military necessity, and humanity. To provide a practical analysis, the paper examines the case studies of the Gaza Strip and Lebanon, documenting how these aircraft have been used for targeted killings, violations of sovereignty, and attacks resulting in disproportionate civilian casualties and infrastructural damage. These actions are presented as systematic breaches of established IHL principles. The study concludes that a significant regulatory vacuum and a near-complete lack of international accountability have facilitated these violations with impunity. Therefore, the paper underscores the urgent need to develop a specialized international legal framework to govern the use of UAVs, one that establishes clear mechanisms for transparency and accountability to protect civilians and uphold the core tenets of IHL in the face of advancing military technology.
المراجع
(1.) Amnesty International. Death by Drone: The Drone Wars and the Ethics of Targeted Killing. Report, 2014.
(2.) Amnesty International. Israel/Gaza: Unlawful Israeli Airstrikes. Report, 2021.
(3.) Beard, Jack M. “Law and War in the Virtual Era.” American Journal of International Law, Vol. 103, No. 3 (2009).
(4.) Bergen, Peter, and Daniel Rothenberg. Drone Wars. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
(5.) Callamard, Agnes. “Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions: Use of Armed Drones.” Report to the UN Human Rights Council, A/HRC/44/38, 2020.
(6.) Casey-Maslen, Stuart. The Use of Armed Drones in Conflict and International Law. Oxford University Press, 2018.
(7.) Cole, Chris. “Drone Wars: Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Out of Control?” Drone Wars UK, 2013.
(8.) Dinniss, Heather, and Jann K. Kleffner. “Soldier or Sensor? The Legal Status of 'Direct Participation in Hostilities' by Unmanned Systems.” Military Law Review, Vol. 186 (2005).
(9.) Human Rights Watch. Between a Drone and Al-Qaeda: The Civilian Cost of US Targeted Killings in Yemen. Report, 2013.
(10.) Human Rights Watch. Drone Warfare: The Law and Ethics of Targeted Killings. Report, 2012.
(11.) Human Rights Watch. “Gaza: Apparent War Crimes During May Fighting.” Report, 2021.
(12.) International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Autonomous Weapon Systems and International Humanitarian Law: A Primer. Report, 2021.
(13.) International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). “Drones and Distinction in Armed Conflict.” ICRC Reports, 2022.
(14.) International Institute of Humanitarian Law. "Drones and the Challenges of International Humanitarian Law." Institute Symposium, 2021.
(15.) Kolan, Mark. "International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Modern Technology." International Law Journal, 2022.
(16.) Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF). “Mental Health Impact of Drone Warfare in Gaza.” Report, 2022.
(17.) Melzer, Nils. Human Rights Implications of the Usage of Drones in Armed Conflict. Report to the UN Human Rights Council, 2013.
(18.) Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR). Field Report, Gaza, 2021.
(19.) Physicians for Human Rights. “Targeting Medical Facilities in Gaza.” Report, 2023.
(20.) Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.
(21.) Reprieve. The Psychological Impact of Drone Strikes on Operators. Report, 2013.
(22.) Schmitt, Michael N. “Drone Attacks under Jus in Bello.” Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 13 (2010).
(23.) Schmitt, Michael N. "Drone Attacks under the Law of Armed Conflict." Harvard National Security Journal, Vol. 4 (2012).
(24.) Schmitt, Michael N. The Ethics of Drone Warfare. Harvard Law Review, 2015.
(25.) Shami, Ali. "Criminal Responsibility in Drone Strikes." Human Rights Review, 2021.
(26.) Stanford Law School & NYU School of Law. “Living Under Drones: Death, Injury, and Trauma to Civilians from US Drone Practices in Pakistan.” Report, 2012.
(27.) The Bureau of Investigative Journalism. “Drone Strikes in Pakistan: Wedding Attack.” Report, 2013.
(28.) United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). “Monthly Reports on Israeli Airspace Violations,” 2023.
(29.) United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). “Gaza Report,” July 2021.
(30.) United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism. Annual Report, 2020.
(31.) United Nations. "International Humanitarian Law: Principles and Challenges." United Nations Report, 2023.
(32.) Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. Basic Books, 2006.
(33.) Wittes, Benjamin, and Gabriella Blum. The Future of Violence: Robots and Germs, Hackers and Drones—Confronting a New Age of Threat. Basic Books, 2015.
