Oversight by the Employees Judiciary Court on exclusion decisions from public office-a comparative study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64184/ajlps.V3.I1.Y2026.P931-963.337Keywords:
Authority, Discipline, Administrative Courts, Discretion of the Presidential Authority, Civil Service Courts, Appeal, CouncilAbstract
The subjective of administrative justice and its regulatory control over administrative action occupies a position of paramount significance within the specialized domain of administrative law. This prominence is fundamentally derived from the core objective entrusted to administrative judges, which entails a rigorous assessment of whether administrative agencies have deviated from compliance with established legal norms in the conduct of their activities and operations. Such judicial oversight is indispensable for achieving good governance and ensuring the comprehensive protection of individual rights against any form of administrative arbitrariness. Consequently, administrative justice is regarded as a vital legal refuge to which individuals resort to enforce the rule of law and its provisions. It serves as a juridical venue dedicated to preserving the rights and obligations of both administrative entities and private individuals, ultimately culminating in the establishment of a pivotal balance between public interests and private rights.
References
References
First: Books
1. Abdullah, A. B. (1996). The General Theory in Administrative Law. Al-Ma'arif Establishment. [In Arabic]
2. Abu Al-Leil, A. (1998). Judiciary of Legitimacy. Arab Renaissance House. [In Arabic]
3. Afify, M. (1981). The Philosophy of Disciplinary Punishment and Its Objectives. Arab Renaissance House. [In Arabic]
4. Al-Adgham, J. A. (2009). Discipline in Light of the Jurisprudence of the Cassation and Administrative Appeal Courts - Supreme Administrative. Legal Writer House. [In Arabic]
5. Al-Hafnawi, A. M. (2007). Procedural Nullity and Its Effect on Disciplinary Lawsuits. University Thought House. [In Arabic]
6. Al-Hashimi, R. M. J. (2010). Judicial Control over the Administration's Authority in Imposing Penalties on Contractors, A Comparative Study. Al-Halabi Legal Publications. [In Arabic]
7. Al-Helou, M. R. (2008). Administrative Judiciary. New University House. [In Arabic]
8. Al-Qaisi, M. D. (2007). General Administrative Law. Al-Halabi Legal Publications. [In Arabic]
9. Al-Ta'i, M. A. K. (2009). The Judge's Authority in Directing Civil Litigation Procedures. Al-Masira House for Publishing and Distribution. [In Arabic]
10. Al-Timawi, S. (1979). Administrative Judiciary, Book Three, Disciplinary Judiciary, A Comparative Study. Arab Thought House. [In Arabic]
11. Al-Timawi, S. (1979). The Brief in Administrative Law, Book Three, Disciplinary Judiciary, A Comparative Study. Arab Thought House. [In Arabic]
12. Farhat, F. (2004). General Administrative Law. Al-Halabi Publications. [In Arabic]
13. Gado, J. M. I. (n.d.). Administrative Procedures for Appealing Administrative Judicial Judgments. Legal Writer House. [In Arabic]
14. Ismail, K. S. (2002). Disciplinary Trials before the Council of State. Egyptian Book House. [In Arabic]
15. Jedidi, S. (2011). The Authority to Discipline Public Employees in Algerian Legislation. New University House. [In Arabic]
16. Khalifa, A. A. M. (2007). Administrative Pleadings. University Thought House. [In Arabic]
17. Khalifa, A. A. M. (2007). Administrative Pleas. Al-Ma'arif Establishment. [In Arabic]
18. Khalifa, A. A. M. (2008). Administrative Pleadings and Evidence before the Administrative Judiciary. National Center for Legal Publications. [In Arabic]
19. Khalifa, A. A. M. (2010). Procedures for Disciplining Public Employees. Al-Ma'arif Establishment. [In Arabic]
20. Nada, M. M. (1981). Expiration of the Disciplinary Lawsuit. Arab Thought House. [In Arabic]
21. Najm, A. H. (1981). Administrative Law. Arab Thought House. [In Arabic]
22. Othman, M. M. M. (1973). The Disciplinary Crime between Administrative Law and the Science of Public Administration, A Comparative Study. Arab Thought House. [In Arabic]
23. Radi, M. L. (2017). Principles of Administrative Judiciary. Al-Qari House. [In Arabic]
24. Tantawi, M. (2009). The Disciplinary Encyclopedia - The Disciplinary Lawsuit, Part Two. Modern University Office. [In Arabic]
25. Yaqout, M. M. (2004). Explanation of Disciplinary Procedures. Al-Ma'arif Establishment. [In Arabic]
26. Yaqout, M. M. (2006). Explanation of the Disciplinary Law for Public Function. Al-Ma'arif Establishment. [In Arabic]
Second: University Theses and Dissertations
1. Al-Dulaimi, S. N. A. (2006). Formal Pleas before the Iraqi Administrative Judiciary [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Baghdad. [In Arabic]
2. Al-Hadithi, S. A. (1972). The Disciplinary System for State Employees in Iraq: A Comparative Study [Unpublished master's thesis]. University of Baghdad. [In Arabic]
3. Ali, M. S. (2015). Estimation of Disciplinary Punishment in Iraq: A Comparative Study [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ain Shams University. [In Arabic]
4. Al-Mawla, K. M. M. (2000). The Competent Authority in Imposing Disciplinary Punishment on Public Employees: A Comparative Study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Mosul. [In Arabic]
5. Anabi, M., & Mayadi, B. (2015). Judicial Control over the Legitimacy of Disciplinary Decisions [Unpublished master's thesis]. Badji Mokhtar University. [In Arabic]
6. Halis, A. (2014). Administrative Judge's Control over the Disciplinary Decision in the Field of Employment [Unpublished master's thesis]. Mohamed Khider University. [In Arabic]
7. Muharib, A. J. (1986). Administrative Discipline in Public Function: A Comparative Study [Unpublished master's thesis]. Ain Shams University. [In Arabic]
Third: Published Research and Articles
1. Al-Ani, W. S. (2011). The effect of the annulment lawsuit on the execution of the appealed decision. Law Journal, 4(16-17). [In Arabic]
2. Al-Barzanji, I. A. (1994). The personal element of competence in the administrative decision. Journal of Legal Sciences, 10(1). [In Arabic]
3. Khattab, D. S. (1975). Simplifying litigation procedures under the Civil Procedure Law. Justice Journal, 1(2). [In Arabic]
4. Shahadeh, M. M. (2004). The principle of the human right to a fair trial in administrative disputes and its applications in the judgments of the French Council of State and the European Court of Human Rights. Kuwait Law Journal, 28(2). [In Arabic]
Fourth: Legislation and Laws
1. Civil Procedure Law.
2. Civil Service Law No. (82) of 2016.
3. Criminal Procedure Law No. (23) of 1970.
4. Discipline of State and Public Sector Employees Law.
5. Law No. (106) of 1989.
6. Law No. (14) of 1991.
7. Public Prosecution Law No. (59) of 1979.
8. State Consultative Council Law No. (17) of 2013.
9. State Consultative Council. (2010). Decisions and Fatwas of the State Consultative Council for the Year 2010.
Fifth: Court Judgments and Decisions
1. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (7/Criminal/2002), dated 13/6/2002.
2. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (20/C/2002), dated 20/6/2002.
3. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (643/Disciplinary/2010), dated 6/6/2010.
4. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (703/Disciplinary/2010), dated 13/6/2010.
5. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (109/C/2013), dated 14/2/2013.
6. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (10/C/2013), dated 14/2/2013.
7. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (106/C/2013), dated 10/2/2013.
8. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (118/C/2013), dated 12/2/2013.
9. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (114), dated 25/5/1994.
10. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (13), dated 19/1/1996.
11. General Disciplinary Council, Decision No. (25), dated 10/11/1999.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ashur Journal of Legal and Political Sciences is issued by the Iraqi Association of Legal Sciences
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The authors retain Full copyright of their published article
Ashur Journal of Legal and Political Sciences applies the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) License to articles and other works we publish. If you submit your paper for publication by AJLPS, you agree to have the CC BY 4.0 license applied to your work.
Articles can be read and shared for under the following conditions:
BY: Attribution must be given to the original source (Attribution)
Full details available at
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
